|
If there's an unhealthy need you're feeling such as:
- the need to be perfect
- the need for approval
- the need to "fix" someone or something
- the need to be a victim or martyr
- the need to have a fantasy relationship
- the need for competition
- the need for confrontations
and more... click here to visit the "Unhealthy Needs" page!
It's new at feeling emotional, 3!



Nurturing Social-Emotional Development Of Gifted Children
By James T. Webb
What Are The Social-Emotional Needs Of Gifted Children?
To a large degree, the needs of gifted children are the same as those of other children. The same developmental stages
occur, though often at a younger age (Webb & Kleine, 1993).
Gifted children may face the
same potentially limiting problems, such as family poverty, substance abuse, or alcoholism. Some needs & problems, however, appear more often among gifted children.
Types Of Problems
It's helpful to conceptualize needs of gifted children in terms of those that arise because of the interaction with the environmental
setting (e.g., family, school, or cultural milieu) & those that arise internally because
of the very characteristics of the gifted child.
Several intellectual &
personality attributes characterize gifted children & should be noted at the outset. These characteristics may be strengths,
but potential problems also may be associated with them (Clark, 1992; Seagoe, 1974).
Some particularly common characteristics
are shown in the table.

Possible Problems That May Be Associated With
Characteristic Strengths Of Gifted Children
| Strengths |
Possible Problems |
| Acquires/retains
information quickly |
Impatient with others; dislikes basic routine. |
| Inquisitive;searches
for significance. |
Asks embarrassing questions; excessive in interests. |
| Intrinsic
motivation. |
Strong-willed; resists
direction. |
| Enjoys problem-solving;
able to conceptualize,questions teaching procedures. abstract, synthesize. |
Resists routine practice; |
| Seeks cause-effect
relations. |
Dislikes unclear/illogical
areas (e.g., traditions or feelings). |
| Emphasizes
truth, equity & fair play. |
Worries about humanitarian
concerns. |
| Seeks to
organize things & people. |
Constructs complicated
rules; often seen as bossy. |
| Large facile
vocabulary; advanced, broad information. |
May use words to manipulate; bored with school & age-peers. |
| High expectations of self & others. |
Intolerant, perfectionistic; may become depressed. |
| Creative/inventive;
likes new ways of doing things. |
May be seen as disruptive
& out of step. |
| Intense
concentration;long attention span & persistence in areas of interest. |
Neglects duties or people during periods of focus; resists interruption; stubbornness. |
|
Sensitivity, empathy; desire to be accepted by others. |
Sensitivity to criticism or peer rejection. |
| High energy,
alertness, eagerness. |
Frustration with inactivity; may be seen as hyperactive. |
| Independent; prefers individualized work; reliant input; nonconformity. |
May reject parent or peer on self. |
| Diverse
interests & abilities; versatility |
May appear disorganized
or scattered; frustrated over lack of time. |
| Strong sense of humor. |
Peers may misunderstand humor; may become "class clown"for attention. |
Adapted from Clark (1992) and Seagoe (1974).

These characteristics are
seldom inherently problematic by themselves. More often, combinations of these characteristics
lead to behavior patterns such as:
Uneven Development.
Motor skills, especially fine-motor, often lag behind cognitive conceptual abilities, particularly in preschool gifted children
(Webb & Kleine, 1993).
These children
may see in their "mind's eye" what they want to do, construct, or draw; however, motor skills don't allow them to achieve
the goal. Intense frustration & emotional outbursts may result.
Peer Relations.
As preschoolers & in primary grades, gifted children (particularly highly gifted) attempt
to organize people & things. Their search for consistency emphasizes "rules," which they attempt to apply to others. They invent complex games & try to organize their playmates,
often prompting resentment in their peers.
Excessive Self-Criticism. The ability to see possibilities & alternatives may imply that youngsters see idealistic images of what they might be & simultaneously berate themselves because they see how they're falling short of an ideal (Adderholt-Elliott, 1989; Powell & Haden, 1984; Whitmore, 1980).
Perfectionism. The ability to see how one might ideally perform, combined with emotional intensity, leads many gifted children to unrealistically high expectations of themselves. In high ability children, perhaps 15-20% may be hindered significantly by perfectionism at some point in their academic careers & even later in life.
Avoidance of Risk-Taking. In the same way the gifted youngsters see the possibilities, they also see potential problems in
undertaking those activities. Avoidance of potential problems can mean avoidance of risk-taking & may result in underachievement (Whitmore, 1980).
Multipotentiality.
Gifted children often have several advanced capabilities & may be involved in diverse activities to an almost frantic degree. Though seldom a problem for the child, this may create problems for the family, as well as quandaries when decisions
must be about career selection (Kerr, 1985; 1991).
Gifted Children with
Disabilities. Physical disabilities can prompt social & emotional difficulties. Intellect may
be high, but motor difficulties such as cerebral palsy may prevent expression of potential.
Visual or hearing
impairment or a learning disability may cause frustration. Gifted children with disabilities tend to evaluate themselves more on what they're unable to do than on their substantial abilities (Whitmore & Maker, 1985).

Problems From Outside Sources
Some common problem patterns are:
- School Culture & Norms.
Gifted children, by definition, are "unusual" when compared with same-age children - at least in cognitive abilities - &
require different educational experiences (Kleine & Webb, 1992).
Schools, however,
generally group children by age. The child often has a dilemma - conform to the expectations for the average child or be seen as nonconformist.
- Expectations by Others. Gifted children - particularly the more creative - don't conform. Nonconformists violate or challenge traditions, rituals, roles, or expectations. Such behaviors often prompt discomfort in others. The gifted child, sensitive to others' discomfort, may then try to hide abilities.
- Peer Relations.
Who is a peer for a gifted child? Gifted children need several peer groups because their
interests are so varied. Their advanced levels of ability may steer them toward older children. They may choose peers by reading
books (Halsted, 1994). Such children are often thought of as "loners." The conflict between fitting in & being an individual may be quite stressful.
- Depression. Depression is usually being angry at oneself or at a situation over which one has little or no control.
In some families,
continual evaluation & criticism of performance - one's own & others - is a tradition. Any natural tendency to self-evaluate
likely will be inflated.
Depression & academic underachievement may be increased. Sometimes educational misplacement causes the gifted youngster to feel
caught in a slow motion world. Depression may result because the child feels caught in an unchangeable situation.
Family Relations.
Families particularly influence the development of social & emotional competence. When problems occur, it isn't because
parents consciously decide to create difficulties for gifted children. It's because parents lack information about gifted
children, or lack support for appropriate parenting, or are attempting to cope with their own unresolved problems (which may stem from their experiences with being gifted).

Preventing Problems
Reach out to Parents.
Parents are particularly important in preventing social or emotional problems. Teaching, no matter how excellent or supportive, can seldom counteract inappropriate
parenting.
Supportive family environments, on the other hand, can counteract unhappy school experiences. Parents need information if they're to nurture well & to be wise advocates for their
children.
Focus on Parents of Young
Children. Problems are best prevented by involving parents when children are young. Parents particularly must understand
characteristics that may make gifted children seem different or difficult.
Educate & Involve Health-Care
& Other Professionals. Concentrated efforts should be made to involve such professionals in state & local
meetings & in continuing education programs concerning gifted children.
Pediatricians,
psychologists & other caregivers such as day-care providers typically have received little training about gifted children
& therefore can provide little assistance to parents (Webb & Kleine, 1993).
Use Educational Flexibility.
Gifted children require different & more flexible educational experiences. When the children come from multicultural or
low-income families, educational flexibility & reaching out may be particularly necessary.
Seven flexibly paced
educational options, relatively easy to implement in most school settings (Cox, Daniel &
Boston, 1985) are:
- early entrance
- grade skipping
- advanced level courses
- compacted courses
- continuous progress in the regular classroom
- concurrent enrollment in advanced classes
- credit by examination
These options
are based on competence & demonstrated ability, rather than on arbitrary age groupings.
Establish Parent Discussion
Groups. Parents of gifted children typically have few opportunities to talk with other parents of gifted children.
Discussion groups provide opportunities to "swap parenting recipes" & child-rearing experiences. Such experiences provide
perspective as well as specific information (Webb & DeVries, 1993).



Unmet Emotional Needs as a Cause of Trauma Janae B. Weinhold. Ph.D
Trauma is defined as “an overwhelming psychological experience that causes changes in the biological stress response.”
When children’s psychological & emotional needs are either not met in an appropriate &/or timely manner, these experiences
are traumatic.
They become hard-wired into
the child’s brain & leave biological & physical symptoms of trauma. These
earliest symptoms, which are very subtle & often invisible to the untrained eye, involve:
Both varieties of behavior
symptoms also include typical physical markers of trauma such as fight / flight / freeze responses, rapid heartbeat, hypervigilance, hyperactivity & increased cortisol levels in the blood.
The correlation between bonding breaks & trauma is very new. Some of the groundbreaking research in this area has been done by Sheila Wang in the Dept. of Psychiatry
at Yale Univ. School of Medicine. Ms. Wang, a researcher in the field of post-traumatic stress, found parallels between the cortisol levels in the bloodstream of children who experience chronic separation from their mothers & adults who experience chronic stress from natural disasters such as hurricanes, floods & human-made disasters such as wars, murders & bombings.
This biologically based data
provides the critical tie linking trauma & bonding breaks, a phenomenon that I call Developmental
Trauma.



Developmental Trauma© Janae
B. Weinhold. Ph.D.
Developmental
Trauma© is inflicted unconsciously & without the malicious
intent by adult caregivers who are unaware of the physical, psychological, mental & spiritual needs of children.
When children don't get their needs for nurturing, protection & safety met in an appropriate &/or timely manner, particularly during the first 3 years of
life, they experience trauma.
Because most adults didn't get many of their own developmental needs met as children & are uneducated
about the normal needs of infants & young children, they lack insensitivity to children's needs.
It's this lack of awareness & sensitivity that prevents adults from effectively meeting children's needs.

Untreated
Developmental Trauma© from the first 3 years of life are also the central cause of intractable conflicts in close relationships. The “compulsion repetition” aspect of trauma, also known as “traumatic reenactment,” causes people to compulsively reenact the themes of their traumatic experiences in ways that form consistent, predictable patterns of behavior within relationships.
Once people discover the cause
& effect correlation between these early events & the kinds of conflict they repeatedly experience, they learn how to use their conflicts to clear the residue of Developmental Trauma© from their lives.
Rather than feeling victimized, people can learn how to change their patterns of "traumatic reenactment" in ways that shift them into a higher level of consciousness.
Recognizing Symptoms of Trauma in Children
Janae B. Weinhold. Ph.D.
Those with training in attachment can identify the
symptoms of Developmental Trauma© in infants who lose psychological contact with their mothers. These symptoms include a panicked
look in the infant’s eyes, frantic searching for the mother’s face, repeated attempts to engage the mother in
some way, inconsolable crying, spitting up of vomit and hyperactive/dysregulated behavior. In older children, it appears as
difficulties with reciprocity, the give-and-take aspect of relationship at the core of bonding.
Developmental traumas create a hyper-sensitivity
to certain kinds of situational "triggers" such as feeling abandoned, neglected or abused that later cause recycling, intractable
conflicts. These situational triggers mold the child’s reactions about the loss of connection to the mother into the
avoidant and anxious/ambivalent forms of insecure bonding also know as “attachment disturbances.” When sufficient
behavioral criteria are present, the “disturbance” becomes a diagnosable mental health problem known as “Reactive
Attachment Disorder” (RAD). RAD has two different varieties: the Inhibited Type, which correlates with the avoidant
form of insecure bonding and the Disinhibited Type, which correlates with the anxious/ambivalent form of insecure bonding.
At a practical level, the most common symptom of
Developmental Trauma© in children is hyperactive, out of control behaviors designed to test the limits of the adult caregivers.
This testing of limits is the primary way that children determine who is in charge in the environment—the adults or
the children. When adults do not explain the rules for behavior and social interactions and the consequences for breaking
these rules, children do not feel safe. They only feel safe with rules that protect them from harm and when there are consequences
in place for those who violate the rules. In fact, children’s “misbehavior” is really a way of forcing adults
to set limits. When they do not, children learn a myriad of ways to take charge of feeling safe in their environment through
aggressive, demanding, oppositional and defiant behaviors designed to intimidate and control the weak or ambivalent adults
around them.
to read more about the physical, psychological, mental &
spiritual needs of children - click here



Marriage: Do we still need it? Nadeem
Malik.
‘In modern
society it is not only acceptable for people to live together without being married, but the concept of marriage is almost frowned upon. In these ‘politically
enlightened times’, more & more people are losing hope in the possibility of any long term relationship & are thus ridding themselves of what has become a ‘meaningless
tradition’. It's clear that this way of thinking isn't confined only to the non-Muslims,
but has become increasingly visible amongst ‘Muslims’’. ‘Trends Vol. 7, Issue 1.
One can't blame people for the disillusionment that they're suffering, after all it's a fact that in the Western world almost 2 out of every 3 marriages end in divorce
within 10 years & most within 5. It's also true that those people who don't divorce but remain married often do so resentfully & due to external consideration rather than sincere reasons.
Unfortunately,
such ‘empty marriages’ cause not only the two individuals involved to suffer much stress & anxiety but create a wave of disharmony throughout society itself. Why then does Islam place such an emphasis on marriage?
In order to consider
this question & do the issue justice it's important to think objectively. As you read, try to do so without being cynical & dismissive. Rather, ponder & reflect with an open heart & an intention to implement the advice given in the words of Allah & the sunnah of the Prophet Mohammad (SAW).
It doesn't matter
if you have been married 10 times before, if you're presently in a relationship that isn't working or if you're just thinking about marriage - it's never too early nor too late to make an active change in order to improve yourself & thus the condition around you.
Remember to point
the critical finger at yourself & think how you can improve rather than accusingly thrust these pages into the face of your partner! It is by example that we
change people not by force.
It's imperative
that before marriage one has the correct requisite intention. In Islamic terms the objectives of marriage can be classified
under 3 general headings.

Firstly, as the
verse illustrates, “Mankind, heed your Lord who has created you from a single soul, and created
its mate from it, and propagated many men and women from them both.” (Qur'an 4:1), to propagate the human race.
Secondly, to preserve
a social sense of morality & chastity, as the Qur'an says: “...live a protected life in marriage,
not indulging in illicit affairs nor having secret lovers.” (Qur'an 4:25).
Finally, to provide
mental peace & develop love & affection - “Among His signs is that He has created spouses for you from among yourselves so that you may
console yourselves with them. He has planted affection and mercy between you; in that are signs for people who reflect.”
(Qur’an 30:21 ).
Obviously, this
topic can't be fully covered in these few pages, thus attention will be given to the more relevant considerations that people
face here in Britain. The decision of whom one marries is perhaps the most important in a person's life. This is particularly the case when living in a society that is hostile to Islam & effort must be focused on activating people to develop a better understanding of the religion.
Marriage is the
starting point of a family & a family is, in turn, the nuclear structure of any society. It's the forum in which natural feelings & emotions can be given full reign to flourish & inherent human emotions can be correctly expressed. It's the forum by which not only does the human race perpetuate itself physically but it also
forms the basis of psychological, sociological & moral education.
A family is one of the bricks that form the solid wall of society & if it is weak itself it will cause the
whole structure to tumble. Clearly then, this isn't one that should he treated trivially or be underestimated.

What factors should be of
primary importance when choosing a spouse? The answer to this question is clear in the following words of the Prophet (SAW);
“A woman is married for four things - her wealth, her family status, her beauty and her religion. So you should
marry the religious woman otherwise you will be a loser.” (Reported in Al-Bukhari)
The powerful hadith makes it clear that although several factors are often considered when it comes to choosing a spouse, piety in religion
has the highest rank of importance. Indeed not only did the wives of the Prophet (SAW) excel in piety but the fist consideration of all the companions was also
the piety of the person in question.
Obviously this
hadith applies to both sexes & perhaps explains why a marital relationship between two people at the time of the companions
set to last for life & it was incredibly rare if it didn't in contrast to the ‘transient marriages’ of today.
It also goes to explain why people felt fulfilled & inspired in their marital relationships rather than stifled & misunderstood.
Let us look then
at the correct attitudes that a husband & wife should posses with regard to one another. Firstly, neither should regard themselves as superior
to the other - an established principle of the faith of a Muslim is that Allah only judges a person by the level of their piety & good deeds.
A person doesn't
have a ‘head start’ in the account of Allah just because of their lineage, gender, race or material worth. This is clear by the following verse: “Verily the most honoured of you in the sight of Allah is
the most righteous of you. And Allah has full knowledge and is well acquainted with all things.” (Qur'an 49:13)
There is no concept
in Islam of ‘equality’ if this means an equal obligation to perform identical acts. However, there's an inherent concept of ‘equity’ meaning that all are answerable equally
for their actions but men & women have different roles & responsibilities.
Even in today’s
‘enlightened’ age, modern research points to such personality differences. To quote the Encyclopaedia Britannica, which perhaps
would not today be as ‘politically correct’ as it could be; “With respect to personality traits, men are
characterised by greater aggressiveness, dominance & achievement motivation, women by their greater dependency, a stronger social orientation & the tendency to be more easily discouraged by failure than men.” (Encyclopaedia Britannica 1984, 19/907)
The relationship
between two people can't, obviously, be clearly defined set down in stone. There must be a degree of fluidity & compromise
to account for the different personality traits of people. This scope has been left within the advice of Islam in the form
of general wisdom being passed on rather than strict rules.
A Muslim has a
sense of nobility, self respect & selflessness when it comes to their spouse. The relationship is based on both a mutual love for Allah & a strong desire to attain His happiness & encourage their partner to do the same.

For a man, he
has been put in a position of responsibility that will entail both an understanding of his obligations & a great deal of self-control to fulfill them. To this end & to buffer any clash of personality trait, man has been advised to be kind & gentle in his conduct.
It isn't befitting
for a Muslim man to show his status, physical strength or social ties to suppress his wife or family. Rather he should show
his true ‘manhood’ by controlling these attributes & using them to his family’s benefit. Whatever physical or social attributes we have do not come
from ourselves, we don't have
a say as to whether we are born male or female or how rich & powerful we will be - rather these things are ordained by Allah & can either be a source of blessing or a potential source of
trial.
The Muslim husband
should feel proud & noble if he spends out of his wealth for his family or treats them well as this will attain him the pleasure of Allah
also. The Prophet (SAW) said;
“The believers
who possess perfect faith are those who display the best manners, and the best among you are those who treat their wives in the best possible manner.”
(Reported in At-Tirmidhi)
This doesn't necessarily
mean that all men should give their wives whatever they want without first giving consideration to the prescribed laws of Allah! What it does mean is that wherever possible the needs &
considerations of the wife should be given paramount importance.
To illustrate
to what extent this consideration should be shown, an extract from the life of the Prophet (SAW) is appropriate. On one occasion
of Hajj, the camel of Safiya (May Allah be pleased with her) sat down on the ground &
she was therefore left behind while the caravan passed on.
The Prophet (SAW) came to her & found her weeping without restraint. He stood there wiping off her tears
with the edge of a sheet with his own hands. While the Prophet (SAW) wiped off tears from
her eyes, she continued to weep unrestrainingly for a long time. (See: The ettiquettes of Islam,
by Doi)
This example illustrates
the consideration & compassion that a Muslim man should show to his wife, even at times when he may not empathize with what the problem is. Even in general terms consideration should be given to the physical & psychological differences between men & women.
On one occasion
the Prophet (SAW) was on a journey & he passed some women riding on a camel. The man
leading the camel drove it on faster, forgetting that this would cause undue discomfort for its passengers. The Prophet (SAW) said to the camel driver: “You have glass cases there. Be gentle with them.” (Reported in Al-Bukhari)
Steeped in history is the
convention that men support women financially. This concept has, however, been abused by men through time. It isn't an unsaid term that just because a man spends his money in the way of his family he is automatically
entitled to some sort of unparalleled respect. Rather he is merely carrying out an obligation placed upon him by his Creator. He has no choice in the matter & although he shouldn't pass unappreciated by his wife & family - he has no right to demand respect.
Allah states in the Qur’an:
“A man of means should spend out of his means,
while anyone whose income is more feeling limited should spend some of what Allah has granted him”
(Qur’an 65:7)
It's obligatory on every man to support & provide for his wife & family, he should recognize this as his duty & not seek to impose it as a favour on his family. On the other hand, he should be made to feel good about fulfilling his duty & not be treated in an ungrateful manner. It's this balance that prevails in all aspects of a marital relationship & is indeed the recipe for success.
It's also important for men to understand that just because they've been given the duty of protecting their spouse & providing for her, this doesn't mean that they're allowed to act unjustly or prevent them from developing
their Islam. Rather, in the Medinan society, women & men, husband & wives, all worked together in the task of developing
a strong community & building a political infrastructure.
Women played a fundamental
role in the teaching, preaching & practice of Islam, both on a personal level & in a public forum. The importance of this was stressed by command of the Prophet (SAW) that;
“If the wife
of anyone of you ask permission to go to the mosque, he should not forbid her.” (Reported in Al-Bukhari)
This is an example
of how it was encouraged that both husband & wife become an integral part of society. The mosque was not only a place of worship but a station
of central public importance & thus men & women were encouraged to frequent it. Reading more deeply into this hadith & placing it on its correct context, it's clear that the underlying
principle is that a husband & wife should regard themselves as a team.
They're BOTH Muslim,
they both have the same accountability to perform their acts of worship & increase their knowledge & practice of Islam & they'll both answer to Allah
for their deeds.
When two people get married
they don't forsake their individual accountability. It's important, particularly for men, to realize that their spouse will have to answer to Allah for their time, energy & wealth as well
as you. Although this sounds like common sense it's often practically neglected. Even amongst ‘practising’ couples today it isn't uncommon to see the husband actively developing this own knowledge
& commitment to Islam, attending more gatherings & giving more in the way of time & money whilst he denies his wife the same opportunities.
The ideal situation
is one where BOTH parties put in the same degree of effort & insha-Allah reap the same amount of reward. Indeed, after
marriage, Shaitan tries his hardest to divide two people & often what should have been a source of bonding becomes a source
of division. Jabir ibn Abdullah said that once the Prophet (SAW) said;
“The throne
of Iblis (Satan), the chief of the devils, is situated above the seas, whence he sends his
bands to send human beings astray.
To Iblis, the most
worthy of devils is the one who causes the greatest wickedness. The devils visit him as their chief to report their deeds to him,
and Iblis gives a hearing to all of them. On one occasion, Iblis remained unimpressed with their achievements, until he managed
to separate them.
He
had achieved this by causing them to have doubts & misgivings about one another. Iblis was so overjoyed to hear this that he drew him close to him in a close embrace, saying, “Yes, you did it,” meaning that he had
really managed to lead human beings astray.” (Reported in Muslim)
Thus it is clear a man should
regard his wife as a companion in life & somebody with whom he should try his utmost to keep amicable links & vice
versa. This teamwork & co-operation should exist not only in a practical sphere but more importantly in a spiritual context. If two people can encourage one another in the true worship of their Creator, which is of course their objective, then it must be a source of much reward
& blessing.
Such an atmosphere would be
created that many of the small things that Shaitan uses to divide people would become obsolete & true inner strength would
emanate from the couple. The incentive from Allah for a husband & wife to attain this spiritual bond together is illustrated
by the following hadith;
“When a man wakes up
and his wife during the night and they offer two Rak’ahs of prayers together, Allah ordains that the man’s name
should be included in the rolls of the male remembers of Allah and the woman’s name in the register of those females
who offer praises to Allah and remember Him.” (Reported in Abu Dawud)
Clearly this level
of spiritual togetherness will be of much practical use in controlling any disagreements between the couple & providing a firm reminder of the
intention behind & objectives of a true Muslim marriage.
As far as the responsibility of a wife are concerned they can be summed up generally by the following verse:
“Honourable women are
devout, guarding the unseen just as Allah orders it to be guarded.” (Qur’an 4:34)
With regard to
what this ‘unseen’ actually is, most scholars are in agreement that it refers to the honour & property of her husband. Many hadith point out that a woman must not permit anybody to enter the house to whom her
husband objects, particularly in his absence.
In a wider context, the example
of the Prophet (SAW)’s wives shows what the ideal Muslim wife’s behaviour should
be. Let it suffice to illustrate this with two examples regarding the first wife of the Prophet (SAW),
Khadijah(RA).
The example of Khadijah (RA) throughout her life was one of limitless support & reassurance to her husband. She provided him with mental security & physical support. She insisted on sharing her husband’s suffering along with his joy. She never doubted him nor criticized him, neither did she undermine him or disobey him.
The first example shows the
degree of trust & respect she had for her husband at the point when he first received revelation. As the Prophet (SAW)
came to her, shivering & disillusioned, believing he was going mad, she comforted him with the following words;
“It cannot
be. Allah will surely never forsake you. You are kind feelings, feelings of kindness to your kin, you always help the weak, you solace the weary, you take care of whoever crosses your threshold, you speak the
truth.” (Tafseer of Ibn Kathir)
The feelings of the Prophet(SAW) for his wife were so great that he said of her,
“I have been
intoxicated by her love.”
(Reported
in Muslim)
Khadijah (RA)’s
support & encouragement left a life-long effect upon the life of the Prophet (SAW). In later years, after her death, he would still remember her
& weep; he continued to look after all her relatives & friends after her passing.
Khadijah(RA) sacrificed her whole life, both materially & physically for the sake of Allah & in support of her husband. So great was her love & support to the Prophet (SAW) that after her death, Aisha(RA)
relates that;
“The Prophet
(SAW) would not leave home without praising Khadijah. One day when he mentioned Khadijah I became annoyed and said, “She was an old woman. In her stead Allah has given you one who is better.” This angered the Prophet (SAW), who said, “God knows, He has given me no better than her. She believed in me when others rejected me. She supported me with her wealth when others left me in the lurch. And Allah gave me children by her, which He has not given me by any
other wives.” (Tafsir Al-Haythami)
These words go
to show the kind of behaviour that is ideally expected from a Muslim wife: to be a station of support for her husband & provide him with as much mental solace that she can. It isn't befitting for a Muslim to be more concerned with material competition, vanity & ingratitude than the welfare of her husband & family.
One of the biggest ills
of Western society has been a rush of ill-defined feminism that has led to a confusion of the roles & responsibilities of man & woman, let alone take away the love, compassion & spirituality that should exist between husband & wife.
A careful balance will surely fail & cause much disarray. The Prophet (SAW) warned us of this when he said;
“Those men
are cursed who try to resemble women and those women are cursed who try to resemble men.”
(Reported in Al-Bukhari)

In conclusion,
there is clearly a detailed set of guidelines laid down by the Creator to help his Creation co-exist in a harmonious fashion.
Marriage is the corner stone of any society & its importance should never be underestimated. Neither should it be treated as something that does require research or preparation.
Rather, it's a
decision of utmost importance that must be made by everybody & clearly the better informed a person is, the better they will be equipped to deal with
any difficulties that arise.
It isn't enough
to assume that when an issue comes up it can be dealt with provided that everybody is ‘chilled out’. In matters
of such high societal & spiritual importance there can be no room or scope to ‘chill out’. The answer lies in going back to the basic sources & materials,
in treating the subject seriously & with due diligence.
Respect, appreciation, patience & forgiveness should be prevalent attributes of any Muslim marriage & there should be no imitation of ‘Western’ values.
If there is then the divorce
statistics will also reflect those of the West & this isn't acceptable in Islam. The Muslim marriage is to build a society
which will be a global example. There's no reason why this example can't have its foundation in Britain & there's no reason
why this example shouldn't begin with you.
Source: oooops, i forgot where i got this article from ;-\ if anyone knows
please let me know so i can credit the author and source. thanks
Basic Survival Needs....
|
 |
|
It's in the news.... news about what you "need" from around the web!
Differing Sexual Needs
Robert Elias Najemy
Life Situations
& Lessons Series
Fanny lost her desire for sexual contact early in her marriage.
This has
become a serious problem for her husband Dennis. Although he tries not to take it personally, he can't help feeling rejected & demeaned as a man. Also, his biological needs cause him to suffer, especially at night.
Fanny loves Dennis & feels badly about her inability to make love to him. She is blocked by a subconscious aversion
toward the male reproductive organ & the sexual act itself. Although she isn't aware of the reason, both the male organ & the act of sex seem dirty to her.
Her search into
why she feels this way has been fruitless until now.
Dennis also loves Fanny very much. This problem, however, causes him to feel great injustice. He needs this
contact physically & emotionally. Fanny understands & respects his need, but feels very much pressured by him & also suffers from an unconquerable aversion when he approaches her sexually.
This
fear of his approaching her causes her to avoid all contact, even simple affection, so he'll not be aroused & the energy between them will not become sexual.
She has begun
occupying herself with many activities outside the home, using up large quantities of energy & avoiding Dennis. She also leaves on the weekends for seminars or retreats. She has found some meaning, but also perhaps some escape.
This adds to Dennis' feelings of injustice & hurt. He seldom sees her at home & would like to spend some quality time with his wife.
What could each of them have to learn?
Fanny:
1. Does she need to work more deeply on discovering the cause of her fear & repulsion toward the male organ & sexual union?
2.
Does she need to force herself to accept her husband sexually even though she doesn't feel it?
3.
Or is her lesson to accept this problem & let her husband work it out from his end?
4. Should she be staying home more with her family even
if this doesn't fulfill her as much as her other activities & even if their material needs
are cared for?
5. Should she be there at home creating w/her presence
a sense of family?
7. What does she need in
order to find a balance?
8. Does she need
to free herself from the belief that sex is dirty or evil?
10. Must she distinguish between affection, hugging & caressing & sex?
2. Should he insist that she stay at home more?
3. Is his lesson to accept this absence of sexual contact?
4. Is he in any way doing something that repulses his wife?
5. Does he need to understand her problem & not take this situation personally?
6. How can he find his happiness without doing injustice to his wife?
7. Should he become less focused on the sexual level for pleasure,
relaxation or affirmation of himself as a man?
8. Can he feel her love & caring for him without its verification thru the sexual act?
9. Does he need to discover
if she may not be having some negative feelings toward him because of something he has or hasn't done?
10. Can he love & feel close to her even if she can't give him what he needs?
12. Perhaps he should let her overcome this in her own
way & timing?
13. Has the time come to become more spiritually oriented
& direct his energies in other directions?
If you're in a position similar to Fanny or Dennis, look
thru these lists of possible lessons & observe which seem to ring a bell in your inner self.
Also be aware that you may have a number of the above-listed lessons as well as others which aren't listed.
Shepherd of the Sick
Poor people with cancer, says Harold Freeman, need a guiding hand
By Katherine Hobson / Posted Sunday, August 20, 2006
US News.com
It's a busy summer afternoon
at the Ralph Lauren Center for Cancer Care & Prevention in Harlem. The breast clinic is in full swing as a surgeon &
a medical assistant go back & forth between exam rooms, performing biopsies, delivering test results & checking in
on patients after treatment.
Maud Colas is hot on their
heels. "You need to go back to Washington Heights & get your original films," Colas
says to one patient. "Can you do that this week?" To another, awaiting the results of a breast biopsy in 3 days, Colas says:
"You call me if there's any worrying, OK?"
One woman has just finished
her 8th go-round of chemotherapy & Colas, she says, helped her apply for Medicaid & financial assistance to cover
transportation expenses to the clinic. The two also prayed together. "I come right to you & let you deal with my problems,"
she says to Colas. Both laugh.
Colas is a patient navigator. Her job at the center-which sees all kinds of cancer patients but particularly those facing
a diagnosis of breast, cervical, prostate, or colon cancer-is to help patients get treatment. Traversing the thickets of healthcare,
especially when dealing with a serious illness like cancer, is difficult for everyone.
It's even more so for the
poor & nonwhite, says surgeon Harold Freeman, president & medical director of the center, who pioneered the patient
navigator program at nearby Harlem Hospital more than 15 years ago.
The navigators aren't medical
professionals but people who speak the same language & are familiar with the patients' communities & cultures. They
come from backgrounds ranging from insurance to social work & teaching & step in when a screening test reveals a suspicious
finding.
Their main role: knocking
down barriers to follow-up tests & treatment. "You have to make sure that whatever the doctor recommends at that point,
the patient gets," says Freeman. That includes helping the patient with child care, prescription drug coverage & getting
to appointments-not to mention providing a shoulder to cry on.
A 2003 study in
the Journal of the American College of Surgeons found that the navigator program at Harlem Hospital boosted the number
of women who were diagnosed when their breast cancer was in its early, treatable stage from 6%
to 41% & the 5 year survival rate from 39% to 70%.
Last year, Congress approved
funding to implement similar pilot projects, while the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services is currently supporting
navigators at 6 facilities across the country. The National Cancer Institute is passing out $25 million in grants to 8 healthcare
institutions for navigators, targeting underserved groups such as low-income patients in Chicago & American Indians in
Portland, Ore.
"We can help coordinate care,
so that if the patient has to take a day off from work, we can get as many appointments as possible in that day," says Karen
Freund, who is overseeing one of the grant recipient programs, at Boston Univ. Medical Center.
The program, Freeman says,
was born out of frustration. Here he was at Harlem Hospital in 1967, armed with the best cancer-fighting tools in the world. But by the time he
saw many patients, their cancer had progressed beyond reach. "For too many of the people whom I had a responsibility to treat," says Freeman, "I didn't have an answer for them."
He
looked to the neighborhood for clues. Something about being black & poor was making people die too soon & its
influence began long before cancer cells began to multiply.
Inspiration. Freeman knew he had to do something. His parents had taught him to look out for the underdog & his Catholic education
also provided him with a sense of responsibility toward the less fortunate. He says he's also inspired by his name: A slave ancestor who bought his own freedom called himself Freeman. "I figure if that guy could do that, I have no excuses," he says.
First
Freeman set up breast-cancer screening programs. But that still didn't do the trick. "You'd give people the test, but somehow
they couldn't get to the next phase."
In 1988,
Freeman took his quest nationwide as president of the American Cancer Society. He pored over studies & statistics &
held hearings. His findings?
Many of the
barriers were a direct result of poverty. But it's not just inadequate health coverage. Even those with insurance might not have, say, the job flexibility to make it to all the medical appointments
a cancer diagnosis demands. Needy patients may also lack knowledge about the importance
of quick follow-up of a suspicious screening result.
Freeman imagined
himself adrift on the sea in a small boat, trying to reach shore but wary of dangerous rocks in his path. A navigator in the
boat with him knew where the hazards were & was able to guide him safely to land. "That's the metaphor that drove me to the word 'navigator,'" he says. "There are rocks in the lives of most people,
but especially the poor."
That doesn't
mean that race is irrelevant. A 1995 NCI study, i.e., found that even stripping out variables like income, education
& insurance, African-Americans were still 20% more likely to die as a result of colon cancer
than whites; there are similar trends in other cancers.
Theories about
the discrepancies range from:
- bias, unconscious or otherwise
- intimidation by the largely white medical establishment
- or a sense of fatalism that leads to unhealthful habits like smoking
That's why the navigators
are outside the medical establishment & are often from the same community as the patients. "It makes a huge difference
for these people just to have someone to talk to, someone who isn't part of the usual clinical setting," says Angelina Esparza,
director of survivorship at the American Cancer Society, which has launched navigators at 60 treatment facilities.
Freeman says the concept might
be adapted to other chronic diseases like diabetes or mental illness. He & his colleagues
are hoping to eventually use navigators to enroll more nonwhites into clinical trials for cancer drugs.
That's important not only
to ensure that study populations are representative of the overall population but also because trial participants often get
better care & access to potentially lifesaving treatments.
Though he has been on the national
stage most of his career - he's also currently senior adviser to the director of the NCI - Freeman still focuses on
his patients in Harlem. "These aren't statistics for him," says Harold Varmus, president of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer
Center (a founding partner of the Ralph Lauren Center) & former director of the National
Institutes of Health.
"He has really lived this issue his entire career."
Born: Washington, D.C., 1933. Family: Married, two sons (both doctors). Education:
A.B., Catholic University, Washington, D.C., 1954; M.D., Howard University, Washington, D.C., 1958. Hobbies: Plays
jazz piano and still has flashes of brilliance on the tennis court.
|
 |
 |
 |
|
The Need for
a Sound System of Education
Moiz Amjad Translated by Nadir Aqueel Ansari
They say that
a Saljuq monarch one day assembled his royal aids & remarked:
"We have an expanding domain. We are doing
whatever is possible for the welfare of our subjects. But, we are aware that we are not without foes. Foes that are lurking around our borders waiting for the opportunity when they can charge upon
us & disrupt the system. We wish that the prime minister may address this need &
think out a plan to thwart their designs.
The state would be too pleased to spend whatever
amount is required to protect the Muslim state against the enemies of Allah. We have full faith in our prime minister & he has the mandate for whatever he deems appropriate. We only want him to ensure that our enemies
should never turn towards this kingdom with nefarious designs."
After quite some time
the ministers again met before the throne to review the performance of the prime minister. The king began:
`Relying on you, we had assigned you
a responsibility. To help you discharge it, we spent from the treasury without any hesitation & you were given all the authority. We expected you to arrange arms & ammunition, establish factories to manufacture weapons, set up institutions for military training,
infuse the spirit of Jihad among our young men & make this kingdom invincible for our enemies. But we have yet to see
any signs of the scale & manner that would merit the execution of this colossal job.
The prime minister replied with contentment that he has already done the needful & nothing remained to be done nor did he think anything else was required. The king stared & said: `What? Have you done anything at all? There are no signs of it !'
To this the prime minister
replied thus & indeed his reply has a great lesson for all the nations who in any degree are concerned about their future. He said:
`Your Majesty,
I have built strong forts for the defence of the brains of the state. All the money has been spent honestly in the right cause. God willing, none will be able to cast a malafide look on our country. The forts I have raised are unprecedented
in any other domain. The armies I have raised, the consummate commanders our soldiers have, are unheard of elsewhere. I have
spread a network of institutions for education throughout the kingdom. The breed that we will nurse in these institutions,
given their comprehension of the spiritual & temporal worlds, their command on the disciplines & arts & given
their morals & character, no enemy would dare think of assaulting this nation. It is my conviction that a nation which bears a sound moral character & has received proper education & whose objectives in life are
effectively conveyed to the next generation, has a very safe & secure future.'
The Institute of Policy Studies Islamabad
conducted a survey of the English medium schools in Pakistan to explore the cultural & religious trends of their students.
The findings were astounding.
55% students don't wish
to continue living in Pakistan.
In a few schools, this percentage
was as high as 63. Only 57% students could read Allama Iqbal; those who could figure out his poetry were much less. 85% students
loved to read English novels. Only 24% offered daily prayers.
Lamenting on the findings
of this survey, "Tameer-i-Millat Foundation" comments:
"Painful as these
are, the results provide a glimpse into the future - a future that will turn every thing upside down - a new crop of men &
women will emerge who will serve not their nation but others, who would hate themselves for what they wouldn't be, who will romanticize about the West, investing it with everything good & looking
at their own people as despicable scum of the earth."
Man isn't born equipped
with education & skills. God has provided for his education essentially thru the following 3 means:
His intuition is an important pool of knowledge wherein God has stored many realities in a way that they gradually manifest themselves in his personality
as he grows. The concepts of part & whole, love & hatred & many other concepts of space & time he doesn't need to learn because God has
imprinted them in his very nature & he receives them & realizes them, as he grows, as a matter of instinctive realities.
He also receives information
thru his senses which he then understands, analyses & classifies to deduce results. These results have precipitated a long history of discoveries & inventions.
The third source of his
knowledge is Revelation thru which he has received many divine directions. Man has been showered with this blessing from the
day he arrived on this planet till the days of Prophet Muhammad (sws), when this source
attained finality.
Enriched by these 3 streams,
man has created an illustrious history of human achievements. He has a treasure of experiences. Every community & society,
in varying degrees, maintains a legacy of all the 3 sources including the divine revelation. This is particularly true in
case of Muslims who proudly claim that they have the God given law in its final, perfect & complete form.
It's our natural
obligation to transmit this treasure of experiences to the next generation. Rather this is one of our prime responsibilities to arrange for its transmission to the succeeding generations. An author has underlined this fact when he attempts to define
education in the following words:
"Education:
A debt due from present to future generations." ("Peter's Quotations", George Peabody,
Pg159) (ref)
What have we earned?
What do we have with us?
How do we apply our minds
to realities & how do we try to approach them?
What history do we have behind
us?
What lessons has it taught
us?
What shape have we given to
our sciences & arts?
What do we believe in & how have we evolved it thru modifications?
How do we define our value system?
Actually we process
all these & fuse them into a host of sciences & disciplines & then try to hand them over to our succeeding generations
in a gradual manner. We want them to carry on this legacy, enrich it, examine it & if necessary modify & amend it
& thus contribute to the enrichment of our collective knowledge.
Obviously, all
this will not happen spontaneously & not without a lot of effort & without evolving a system for it.
History, sciences &
experience are the building blocks of the social psyche of a community & consequently of the individuals who depend
on the community for the development of their personality. The social fabric is woven & maintained on the strength of
these traditions & mores. It's from this fabric, that state, society, culture & civilization rise & flourish.
It's quite obvious
that without our efforts to ensure communication of our experiences, values & knowledge to the future generation, the baffling progress in sciences, rise of civilization & culture, advances
in arts & disciplines couldn't have been realized. We would still be living the lives of cavemen, clothed in leaves, burning
fire by rubbing stone, eating wild bushes & raw meat & drinking unclean water.
So we have compelling
reasons to believe that whatever progress we have made could only be realized thru safe, organized & honest transfer of our experiences & knowledge to the subsequent generations.
Besides conveying sciences
& experiences, it's also imperative for every society to make over to its successors, its ideals, beliefs & values. A western intellectual, Dean Willian R. Inge, points out:
"The aim of education is the knowledge not of fact, but of values." ("Peter's Quotations", Dean William, Pg161)
The "Encyclopedia Britannica"
asserts:
"Education
can be viewed as the transmission of the values & accumulated knowledge of the society." ("History of Education", Vol 6 , Pg 316, Ed 1973)
It, therefore,
becomes our vital responsibility to evolve a system to safely & effectively transmit our goals & ideals to our descendants. It's as significant as the need
to evolve a political system, an economic system or a system of social relationships & values.
This is what education
& training signifies.
If you wish to predict the future of a nation, the easiest & surest way of doing it would be
to study its education system. Actually the system of education of a nation determines its destiny. It determines the value system of the future generations, their mental & moral outlook, their fields of interest & the form they'll assume within
the span of next 20 or 30 years.
This outstanding significance
of the system of education demands every nation to be sensitive about it at all levels - at the individual level, at the level of a family & at the level of the state. We should remain
alive to the fact that if a society grows irresponsible about its system of education & training, its future is jeopardized & to say the least, looms on the bounds of uncertainty.
Bearing this in mind,
when we turn to the education system of our country we feel sorry to say that this subject has been the victim of extreme
& blatant negligence & laxity of our rulers, elders & intellectuals. After 50 years of trials & errors, a perusal of the ducation
policy shows that probably it's only aimed at spreading literacy & short of which no higher ideals have been thought of.
It isn't based on principles.
Its authors don't know what do they want to convey to their descendants. They're hopelessly oblivious of the fact that their policy making is actually determining (or should we say undermining)
the future prospects of a nation.
Syed Abul Aala Maudoodi
points out:
"The children of every nation are actually the judicial order sheet for its future. Nature sends it blank &
the nations are asked to write a judgement to mark their future on it in their own hand. But we are that bankrupt nation that hands over this order sheet to others
so that they may write on it whatever they wish, be it a death sentence for us." ("Ta`leemat", Pg 58)
What traits do we want to
nurse in our people?
What type of human beings
are we aiming at?
What kind of citizens do we
require?
What role do we expect them to play as a member of the Muslim Ummah?
What type of Ummah are we
interested in building?
We have to search
for the answers to these questions & on those answers would rest the ideals & objectives of our system of education
& training.
If we seek the answers
to these questions from the Holy Quran, we would immediately realize that we should aim at the formation of an Ummah that
can shine as an ideal for both, individual & collective righteousness. It flows from this statement that to achieve this goal we must make
the development of individual character the cornerstone of our education policy.
Sciences, economics &
other disciplines are to us mere instruments to realize this collective objective. Two institutions are critical for
the building up of morals & character of a nation: mother's training & education at school.
No individual or institution
in a nation can match the role of the mother towards the evolution of its character. There's no training institution
greater that the lap of a mother. It has no substitute. It's the first school the child is exposed to, from where he learns
the first lessons, internalizes values & determines his objectives in life.
In other words,
a mother lays the first building blocks for the child's character & moral makeup.
The second
training institution is the school which the child attends. This system of education is actually the stream from where
the society gets clean drinking water. If it gets turbid & starts stinking, then you never know which parts of the society
may also start stinking any moment.
This institution
is so important that even the mothers are being trained & educated by it. Therefore, it's high time to study & analyze our
education system minutely & all its aspects need to be examined with reference to our
national goals & objectives. The state should underline its functions & obligations to improve the existing arrangement & at the same time every individual should also come up to play his due role.
What You'll Wish You'd Known
Paul Graham
January 2005
(I wrote
this talk for a high school. I never actually gave it, because the school authorities vetoed the plan to invite me.)
When I said I was speaking at a high school, my friends were
curious. What will you say to high school students? So I asked them, what do you wish someone had told you in high school? Their
answers were remarkably similar. So I'm going to tell you what we all wish someone had told us.
I'll start by telling you something you don't have to know in high school: what you want to do with your life.
People are always asking you this, so you think you're supposed to have an answer. But adults ask this mainly as a conversation starter. They want to know what sort of person
you are & this question is just to get you talking. They ask it the way you might poke a hermit crab in a tide pool, to
see what it does.
If I were back in high school & someone asked about my plans, I'd say that my first priority was to learn what the options were. You don't need to be
in a rush to choose your life's work. What you need to do is discover what you like. You
have to work on stuff you like if you want to be good at what you do.
It might seem
that nothing would be easier than deciding what you like, but it turns out to be hard, partly because it's hard to get an
accurate picture of most jobs. Being a doctor isn't the way it's portrayed on TV. Fortunately you can also watch real doctors,
by volunteering in hospitals. [1]
But there are other jobs you can't learn about, because no one
is doing them yet. Most of the work I've done in the last 10 years didn't exist when I was in high school. The world changes
fast & the rate at which it changes is itself speeding up. In such a world it's not a good idea to have fixed plans.
And yet every May, speakers all over the country fire up the Standard Graduation
Speech, the theme of which is: don't give up on your dreams. I know what they mean, but this is a bad way to put it, because
it implies you're supposed to be bound by some plan you made early on. The computer world has a name for this:
premature optimization.
And it's synonymous
with disaster. These speakers would do better to say simply, don't give up.
What
they really mean is, don't get demoralized. Don't think that you can't do what other people can. And I agree you shouldn't underestimate your potential. People who've done great
things tend to seem as if they were a race apart. And most biographies only exaggerate this illusion, partly due to the worshipful attitude biographers inevitably sink into & partly because, knowing how the story ends, they can't help streamlining the plot
till it seems like the subject's life was a matter of destiny, the mere unfolding of some innate genius. In fact I suspect
if you'd the 16 year old Shakespeare or Einstein in school with you, they'd seem impressive, but not totally unlike your other
friends.
Which is an uncomfortable thought. If they were just like us, then they had to work very hard to do what they did. And that's one reason we like to believe in genius. It gives us an excuse for being lazy. If these guys were able to do what they did only because of some magic Shakespeareness
or Einsteinness, then it's not our fault if we can't do something as good.
I'm not
saying there's no such thing as genius. But if you're trying to choose between two theories & one gives you an excuse
for being lazy, the other one is probably right.
So far we've cut the Standard Graduation
Speech down from "don't give up on your dreams" to "what someone else can do, you can do." But it needs
to be cut still further. There is some variation in natural ability. Most people overestimate its role, but it does
exist. If I were talking to a guy 4 feet tall whose ambition was to play in the NBA, I'd feel pretty stupid saying, you can
do anything if you really try. [2]
We need to cut
the Standard Graduation Speech down to, "what someone else with your abilities can do, you can do & don't underestimate
your abilities." But as so often happens, the closer you get to the truth, the messier your sentence gets. We've taken a nice, neat (but wrong) slogan & churned
it up like a mud puddle. It doesn't make a very good speech anymore. But worse still, it doesn't tell you what to do anymore.
Someone with your abilities? What are your abilities?
Upwind
I think the solution is to work in the other direction. Instead of working back from a goal, work forward from promising situations. This is what most successful people actually do anyway.
In the graduation-speech approach, you decide where you
want to be in 20 years & then ask: what should I do now to get there? I propose instead that you don't commit to anything
in the future, but just look at the options available now & choose those that will give you the most promising range of
options afterward.
It's not so important what you work on, so long as you're not wasting your time. Work on things that interest you & increase your options &
worry later about which you'll take.
Suppose you're a college freshman deciding whether
to major in math or economics. Well, math will give you more options: you can go into almost any field from math. If you major
in math it will be easy to get into grad school in economics, but if you major in economics it will be hard to get into grad
school in math.
Flying a glider is a good metaphor here. Because a glider doesn't
have an engine, you can't fly into the wind without losing a lot of altitude. If you let yourself get far downwind of good
places to land, your options narrow uncomfortably. As a rule you want to stay upwind. So I propose that as a replacement for "don't give up on your dreams." Stay upwind.
How do you do that, though? Even if math is upwind of economics, how are you supposed to know
that as a high school student?
Well, you don't & that's what you need to find out. Look for smart people & hard problems. Smart people tend to clump together
& if you can find such a clump, it's probably worthwhile to join it. But it's not straightforward to find these, because there is a lot of faking going on.
To a newly arrived undergraduate, all university departments look much the same. The professors all seem forbiddingly
intellectual & publish papers unintelligible to outsiders. But while in some fields the papers are unintelligible because
they're full of hard ideas, in others they're deliberately written in an obscure way to seem as if they're saying something
important. This may seem a scandalous proposition, but it has been experimentally verified, in the famous Social Text affair.
Suspecting that the papers published by literary theorists were often just intellectual-sounding nonsense, a physicist deliberately
wrote a paper full of intellectual-sounding nonsense & submitted it to a literary theory journal, which published it.
The best protection is always to be working on hard problems. Writing novels is hard. Reading novels isn't. Hard means worry: if you're not worrying
that something you're making will come out badly, or that you won't be able to understand something you're studying, then it isn't hard enough. There has to be suspense.
Well,
this seems a grim view of the world, you may think. What I'm telling you is that you should worry? Yes, but it's not as bad as it sounds. It's exhilarating to overcome worries.
You don't see faces much happier than people winning gold medals. And you know why they're so happy? Relief.
I'm not saying this is the only way to be happy. Just that some kinds of worry aren't as bad as they sound.
Ambition
In practice, "stay upwind" reduces to "work on hard problems." And you can start today. I wish
I'd grasped that in high school.
Most people like to be good at what they do. In
the so-called real world this need is a powerful force. But high school students rarely benefit from it, because they're given a fake thing to do. When I was in high school,
I let myself believe that my job was to be a high school student. And so I let my need to be good at what I
did be satisfied by merely doing well in school.
If you'd asked me in high school what the difference
was between high school kids & adults, I'd have said it was that adults had to earn a living. Wrong. It's that adults
take responsibility for themselves. Making a living is only a small part of it. Far more important is to take intellectual responsibility for oneself.
If I'd to go thru high school again, I'd treat it like a day job. I
don't mean that I'd slack in school. Working at something as a day job doesn't mean doing it badly. It means not being defined
by it. I mean I wouldn't think of myself as a high school student, just as a musician with a day job as a waiter doesn't think of himself as a waiter. [3] And when I wasn't working at my day job I'd start trying to do real work.
When I ask people what they regret most about high school, they nearly all say the same thing: that they wasted so much time. If you're wondering what you're
doing now that you'll regret most later, that's probably it. [4]
Some people say this is inevitable - that
high school students aren't capable of getting anything done yet. But I don't think this is true. And the proof is that you're bored. You probably weren't bored when you were 8. When you're 8 it's called "playing" instead of "hanging out," but it's the same thing. And when I was 8,
I was rarely bored. Give me a back yard & a few other kids & I could play all day.
The reason
this got stale in middle school & high school, I now realize, is that I was ready for something else. Childhood was getting
old.
I'm not saying you shouldn't hang out with your friends - that you should
all become humorless little robots who do nothing but work. Hanging out with friends is like chocolate cake. You enjoy it
more if you eat it occasionally than if you eat nothing but chocolate cake for every meal. No matter how much you like chocolate
cake, you'll be pretty queasy after the third meal of it. And that's what the malaise one feels in high school is: mental
queasiness. [5]
You may be thinking, we have to do more than get good grades. We have to have extracurricular activities. But you know perfectly well
how bogus most of these are. Collecting donations for a charity is an admirable thing to do, but it's not hard. It's not getting something done. What I mean by getting something done is learning
how to write well, or how to program computers, or what life was really like in preindustrial societies, or how to draw the
human face from life. This sort of thing rarely translates into a line item on a college application.
Corruption
It's dangerous to design your life around getting into college, because the people you have to
impress to get into college aren't a very discerning audience. At most colleges, it's not the professors who decide whether
you get in, but admissions officers & they're nowhere near as smart. They're the NCOs of the intellectual world. They
can't tell how smart you are. The mere existence of prep schools is proof of that.
Few parents
would pay so much for their kids to go to a school that didn't improve their admissions prospects. Prep schools openly say this is one of their aims. But what that means, if you stop to think about it, is that they can hack the admissions process: that they can take the very same kid & make him seem a more appealing
candidate than he would if he went to the local public school. [6]
Right now most
of you feel your job in life is to be a promising college applicant. But that means you're designing your life to satisfy
a process so mindless that there's a whole industry devoted to subverting it. No wonder you become cynical. The malaise you
feel is the same that a producer of reality TV shows or a tobacco industry executive feels. And you don't even get paid a
lot.
So what do you do? What you shouldn't do is rebel. That's what I did & it
was a mistake. I didn't realize exactly what was happening to us, but I smelled a major rat. And so I just gave up. Obviously
the world sucked, so why bother?
When I discovered that one of our teachers was herself
using Cliff's Notes, it seemed par for the course. Surely it meant nothing to get a good grade in such a class.
In retrospect this was stupid. It was like someone getting fouled in a soccer game & saying,
hey, you fouled me, that's against the rules & walking off the field in indignation. Fouls happen. The thing to do when
you get fouled is not to lose your cool. Just keep playing.
By putting you in this situation, society has fouled
you. Yes, as you suspect, a lot of the stuff you learn in your classes is crap. And yes, as you suspect, the college admissions
process is largely a charade. But like many fouls, this one was unintentional. [7] So just keep playing.
Rebellion is almost as stupid as obedience. In either case you let yourself be defined by what they tell you
to do. The best plan, I think, is to step onto an orthogonal vector. Don't just do what they tell you & don't just refuse to. Instead treat school
as a day job. As day jobs go, it's pretty sweet. You're done at 3 o'clock & you can even work on your own stuff while
you're there.
Curiosity
And what's your real job supposed to be? Unless you're Mozart, your first task is
to figure that out. What are the great things to work on? Where are the imaginative people? And most importantly, what are
you interested in? The word "aptitude" is misleading, because it implies something innate. The most powerful sort of aptitude
is a consuming interest in some question & such interests are often acquired tastes.
A
distorted version of this idea has filtered into popular culture under the name "passion." I recently saw an ad for waiters saying they wanted people with a "passion for service." The real thing isn't something
one could have for waiting on tables. And passion is a bad word for it. A better name would be curiosity.
Kids are curious, but the curiosity I mean has a different shape from kid curiosity. Kid curiosity is broad & shallow; they ask why at random about everything. In most adults this curiosity dries up entirely. It has to: you can't get anything done if you're always asking why about everything. But in ambitious
adults, instead of drying up, curiosity becomes narrow & deep. The mud flat morphs into a well.
Curiosity turns work into play. For Einstein, relativity wasn't a book full of hard stuff he had to learn for an exam. It was a mystery
he was trying to solve. So it probably felt like less work to him to invent it than it would seem to someone now to learn
it in a class.
One of the most dangerous illusions you get from school is the idea
that doing great things requires a lot of discipline. Most subjects are taught in such a boring way that it's only by discipline
that you can flog yourself through them. So I was surprised when, early in college, I read a quote by Wittgenstein saying
that he had no self-discipline & had never been able to deny himself anything, not even a cup of coffee.
Now I know a number of people who do
great work & it's the same with all of them. They have little discipline. They're all terrible procrastinators & find
it almost impossible to make themselves do anything they're not interested in. One still hasn't sent out his half of the thank-you
notes from his wedding, 4 years ago. Another has 26,000 emails in her inbox.
I'm
not saying you can get away with zero self-discipline. You probably need about the amount
you need to go running. I'm often reluctant to go running, but once I do, I enjoy it. And
if I don't run for several days, I feel ill. It's the same with people who do great things. They know they'll feel bad if
they don't work & they have enough discipline to get themselves to their desks to start working. But once they get started,
interest takes over & discipline is no longer necessary.
Do you think Shakespeare was gritting his teeth & diligently trying to write Great Literature? Of course not. He was having fun. That's
why he's so good.
If you want to do good work, what you need
is a great curiosity about a promising question. The critical moment for Einstein was when he looked at Maxwell's equations & said, what the
hell is going on here?
It can take years to zero in on a productive question, because
it can take years to figure out what a subject is really about. To take an extreme example, consider math. Most people think
they hate math, but the boring stuff you do in school under the name "mathematics" isn't at all like what mathematicians do.
The great mathematician G. H. Hardy said he didn't like math in high school either. He only took
it up because he was better at it than the other students. Only later did he realize math was interesting - only later did he start to ask questions instead of merely answering them correctly.
When a friend of mine used to grumble because he had to write a paper for school, his mother would tell him:
find a way to make
it interesting.
That's what you
need to do:
find a question that
makes the world interesting.
People who do
great things look at the same world everyone else does, but notice some odd detail that's compellingly mysterious.
And not only in intellectual matters. Henry Ford's great question was, why do cars have to be
a luxury item? What would happen if you treated them as a commodity? Franz Beckenbauer's was, in effect, why does everyone
have to stay in his position? Why can't defenders score goals too?
Now
If it takes years to articulate great questions, what do you do now, at 16? Work toward finding
one. Great questions don't appear suddenly. They gradually congeal in your head. And what makes them congeal is experience.
So the way to find great questions isn't to search for them - not to wander about thinking, what great discovery shall I make?
You can't answer that; if you could, you'd have made it.
The way to get a big idea
to appear in your head isn't to hunt for big ideas, but to put in a lot of time on work that interests you & in the process
keep your mind open enough that a big idea can take roost. Einstein, Ford & Beckenbauer all used this recipe. They all
knew their work like a piano player knows the keys. So when something seemed amiss to them, they had the confidence to notice it.
Put in time how & on what? Just pick a project that seems interesting:
to master some chunk of material, or to make something, or to answer some question. Choose a project that will take less than
a month & make it something you have the means to finish. Do something hard enough to stretch you, but only just, especially
at first. If you're deciding between two projects, choose whichever seems most fun. If one blows up in your face, start another.
Repeat till, like an internal combustion engine, the process becomes self-sustaining, & each project generates the next
one. (This could take years.)
It may be just as
well not to do a project "for school," if that will restrict you or make it seem like work. Involve your friends if you want,
but not too many & only if they're not flakes. Friends offer moral support (few startups are started by one person), but secrecy also has its advantages. There's
something pleasing about a secret project. And you can take more risks, because no one will know if you fail.
Don't worry if a project doesn't seem to be on the path to some goal you're supposed
to have. Paths can bend a lot more than you think. So let the path grow out the project. The most important thing is to be excited about it, because it's by doing that you learn.
Don't disregard unseemly motivations.
One of the most powerful is the desire to be better than other people at something. Hardy said that's what got him started & I think the only unusual thing about him is that he admitted it. Another powerful motivator is the desire to do, or know, things you're not supposed to. Closely related is the desire to do something audacious. 16 year olds aren't supposed to write novels. So if you try, anything you achieve is on the plus
side of the ledger; if you fail utterly, you're doing no worse than expectations. [8]
Beware of bad models. Especially when they excuse laziness. When I was in high
school I used to write "existentialist" short stories like ones I'd seen by famous writers. My stories didn't have a lot of
plot, but they were very deep. And they were less work to write than entertaining ones would have been. I should have known
that was a danger sign. And in fact I found my stories pretty boring; what excited me was the idea of writing serious, intellectual stuff like the famous writers.
Now
I have enough experience to realize that those famous writers actually sucked. Plenty of famous people do; in the short term,
the quality of one's work is only a small component of fame. I should have been less worried about doing something that seemed
cool & just done something I liked. That's the actual road to coolness anyway.
A
key ingredient in many projects, almost a project on its own, is to find good books. Most books are bad. Nearly all textbooks
are bad. [9] So don't assume a subject is to be learned from whatever book on it happens to be closest. You have to search
actively for the tiny number of good books.
The important thing is to get out there
& do stuff. Instead of waiting to be taught, go out & learn.
Your life doesn't
have to be shaped by admissions officers. It could be shaped by your own curiosity. It's for all ambitious adults. And you don't have to wait to start. In fact, you don't have to wait to be an adult. There's
no switch inside you that magically flips when you turn a certain age or graduate from some institution. You start being an
adult when you decide to take responsibility for your life. You can do that at any age. [10]
This may sound like bullshit. I'm
just a minor, you may think, I have no money, I have to live at home, I have to do what adults tell me all day long. Well, most adults labor under restrictions
just as cumbersome & they manage to get things done. If you think it's restrictive being a kid, imagine having kids.
The only real difference between
adults & high school kids is that adults realize they need to get things done &
high school kids don't. That realization hits most people around 23. But I'm letting you in on the secret early. So get to
work. Maybe you can be the first generation whose greatest regret from high school isn't how much time you wasted.
Notes
[1] A doctor friend warns that even this can give
an inaccurate picture. "Who knew how much time it would take up, how little autonomy one would have for endless years of training
& how unbelievably annoying it is to carry a beeper?"
[2] His best bet would probably be to become dictator
& intimidate the NBA into letting him play. So far the closest anyone has come is Secretary of Labor.
[3]
A day job is one you take to pay the bills so you can do what you really want, like play in a band, or invent relativity.
Treating high school as a day job might actually make it easier for some students to get good
grades. If you treat your classes as a game, you won't be demoralized if they seem pointless.
However bad your classes, you need
to get good grades in them to get into a decent college. And that is worth doing, because universities are where a lot of the clumps of smart people are these days.
[4]
The second biggest regret was caring so much about unimportant things. And especially about what other people thought of them.
I think what they really mean, in the latter case, is caring what random people thought of them. Adults care just as much what other people think, but they get to be more selective about the other people.
I have about 30 friends
whose opinions I care about & the opinion of the rest of the world barely affects me. The problem in high school is that your peers are chosen for you by accidents
of age & geography, rather than by you based on respect for their judgment.
[5] The key to wasting time is distraction. Without distractions it's too obvious
to your brain that you're not doing anything with it & you start to feel uncomfortable. If you want to measure how dependent you've become on distractions, try this experiment: set aside a chunk of time on a weekend & sit alone & think. You can have a notebook to write your thoughts down in, but nothing else: no friends, TV, music, phone, IM, email, Web, games, books, newspapers, or magazines. Within an
hour most people will feel a strong craving for distraction.
[6] I don't mean to
imply that the only function of prep schools is to trick admissions officers. They also generally provide a better education.
But try this thought experiment: suppose prep schools supplied the same superior education but had a tiny (.001) negative effect on college admissions.
How many parents would still send their kids to them?
It might also be argued that
kids who went to prep schools, because they've learned more, are better college candidates. But this seems empirically
false. What you learn in even the best high school is rounding error compared to what you learn in college. Public school
kids arrive at college with a slight disadvantage, but they start to pull ahead in the sophomore year.
(I'm not saying public
school kids are smarter than preppies, just that they're within any given college. That follows necessarily if you agree prep
schools improve kids' admissions prospects.)
[7] Why does society foul you? Indifference, mainly. There are simply no
outside forces pushing high school to be good. The air traffic control system works because planes would crash otherwise.
Businesses have to deliver because otherwise competitors would take their customers. But no planes crash if your school sucks
& it has no competitors. High school isn't evil; it's random; but random is pretty bad. [8]
And then of course there's money. It's not a big factor in high school, because you can't do much that anyone wants. But a
lot of great things were created mainly to make money. Samuel Johnson said "no man but a blockhead ever wrote except for money."
( Many hope he was exaggerating.) [9] Even college
textbooks are bad. When you get to college, you'll find that ( with a few stellar exceptions)
the textbooks aren't written by the leading scholars in the field they describe. Writing college textbooks is unpleasant work, done mostly by people who need the money. It's unpleasant because the publishers exert so much control & there are few things worse than close supervision by someone who doesn't understand what you're doing. This phenomenon is apparently even worse in the production of high school textbooks.
[10] Your teachers are always telling you to behave like adults. I wonder if they'd like it if you did. You
may be loud & disorganized, but you're very docile compared to adults. If you actually started acting like adults, it
would be just as if a bunch of adults had been transposed into your bodies. Imagine the reaction of an FBI agent or taxi driver
or reporter to being told they had to ask permission to go the bathroom & only one person could go at a time. To say nothing
of the things you're taught. If a bunch of actual adults suddenly found themselves trapped in high school, the first thing they'd do is form a union & renegotiate all the rules with the administration.
Thanks to Ingrid Bassett, Trevor Blackwell, Rich Draves, Dan Giffin, Sarah Harlin, Jessica Livingston,
Jackie McDonough, Robert Morris, Mark Nitzberg, Lisa Randall & Aaron Swartz for reading drafts of this & to many others
for talking to me about high school.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|